Truly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North has been the Anglo-American dual world power for some time, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore. ...  moreTruly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North has been the Anglo-American dual world power for some time, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore.

Oh, and here's another facet that I just thought of. The ancient Assyrian empire headed by Babylon had another capital city of importance as well, Nineveh. Today, the United States and Great Britain have, respectively, New York City and London. Coincidence???

When one truly does see the puzzle pieces coming together, one certainly cannot disregard the evidence.

As I've said before, the Governing Body has been wrong in the past and I am pretty sure they're wrong again. At this point, I am 100% certain their assessment on 1914 C.E. was, and is still, way off base. From what I understand of the scriptures Christ does not begin his millennial reign until after Armageddon with the abyssing of Satan the Devil.

1914 C.E. could very well mark the beginning of the battle in the heavens (and this sure would explain a lot) with the banishment of Satan and his demons from the heavenly realms, but not the beginning of Christ reign.

It is also important to note that Jesus at Matthew 12:42 called himself greater than Solomon. Solomon's reign was peaceful, so too, this being the case, since Jesus is called the Prince of Peace, should not one expect his ENTIRE reign to be peaceful???  

Truly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North is likely the Anglo-American dual world power for some time, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore....  moreTruly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North is likely the Anglo-American dual world power for some time, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore.

Oh, and here's another facet that I just thought of. The ancient Assyrian empire headed by Babylon had another capital city of importance as well, Nineveh. Today, the United States and Great Britain have, respectively, New York City and London. Coincidence???

When one truly does see the puzzle pieces coming together, one certainly cannot disregard the evidence.

As I've said before, the Governing Body has been wrong in the past and I am pretty sure they're wrong again. At this point, I am 100% certain their assessment on 1914 C.E. was, and is still, way off base. From what I understand of the scriptures Christ does not begin his millennial reign until after Armageddon with the abyssing of Satan the Devil.

1914 C.E. could very well mark the beginning of the battle in the heavens (and this sure would explain a lot) with the banishment of Satan and his demons from the heavenly realms, but not the beginning of Christ reign.

It is also important to note that Jesus at Matthew 12:42 called himself greater than Solomon. Solomon's reign was peaceful, so too, this being the case, since Jesus is called the Prince of Peace, should not one expect his ENTIRE reign to be peaceful???  

Truly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North is likely the Anglo-American dual world power, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore.

Oh, and he...  moreTruly,
Thank you so much for posting!

This has been my assessment for some time. I've been thinking for awhile that the real King of the North is likely the Anglo-American dual world power, and I've already spoken about my conviction that the United States (and I am pretty sure this includes the London banksters) is the 'Babylon the Great' of Revelation. After all, when one considers ALL the many parallels between ancient Babylon and the United States it's impossible to ignore.

Oh, and here's another facet that I just thought of. The ancient Assyrian empire headed by Babylon had another capital city of importance as well, Nineveh. Today, the United States and Great Britain have, respectively, New York City and London. Coincidence???

When one truly does see the puzzle pieces coming together, one certainly cannot disregard the evidence.

As I've said before, the Governing Body has been wrong in the past and I am pretty sure they're wrong again. At this point, I am 100% certain their assessment on 1914 C.E. was, and is still, way off base. From what I understand of the scriptures Christ does not begin his millennial reign until after Armageddon with the abyssing of Satan the Devil.

1914 C.E. could very well mark the beginning of the battle in the heavens (and this sure would explain a lot) with the banishment of Satan and his demons from the heavenly realms, but not the beginning of Christ reign.

It is also important to note that Jesus at Matthew 12:42 called himself greater than Solomon. Solomon's reign was peaceful, so too, this being the case, since Jesus is called the Prince of Peace, should not one expect his ENTIRE reign to be peaceful???