John

Tags

Popular Blogs

The Fraud of the PCR Test

The Covid pandemic is driven by the faulty PCR tests, just like Pfizer’s ex-Vice President, Dr. Michael Yeadon, told us couple of years ago. “Almost all” of the tests for Covid-19 are producing false positives, Dr. Yeadon warns. Why is that?
 
In "This week in Virology" video which can be watched here COVID-19 with Dr. Anthony Fauci , Dr. Anthony Fauci himself admitted this fact. He made a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed. An excerpt from Dr. Fauci's key quote goes this way “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”
 

450_e81df339d339bfdaa8b56cdc4feb448a.png

 
Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient. Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant. That’s called a false positive. What Dr. Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles not 35. Therefore, all labs in the US following the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because… Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result!
 
The total number of COVID cases in the world—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity. The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers. A team of over 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich have carried out legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO & the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

Fuellmich and his team present the faulty PCR test and the order for doctors to label any comorbidity death as a Covid death as fraud. The PCR test was never designed to detect pathogens and is 100% faulty at 35 cycles. All the PCR tests overseen by the CDC are set at 37 to 45 cycles. The CDC admits that any tests over 28 cycles are not admissible for a positive reliable result. This alone invalidates over 90% of the alleged covid cases / ”infections” tracked by the use of this faulty test. Over 22 highly renowned scientists conclude that the PCR test produces 97% false positives or more. So out of all of the Covid patients we’ve ever seen, at least 97% never had Covid.
 

450_25b49474978d43693f1dd7f504130a4c.png

Top 5 of the world's leading PCR Test Manufacturers are using 39 cycles and over. All these test protocols literally off the chart. All PCR tests being used in the world today are operating in a zero % accuracy range.
 
1. Gnomegen PCR Test - 39 cycles
2. GK PCR Test - 40 cycles
3. InBios PCR Test - 45 cycles
4. Luminex Aires PCR Test - 45 cycles
5. Quest PCR Test - 50 cycles
 

450_100481f578a3e72c312d9aae24bf832b.png

 
The inventor of the PCR test, which has been widely used in detecting COVID-19, previously slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci in his role in the pandemic by calling him a liar. He also strongly criticized Fauci’s understanding of science, while revealing that the PCR test is not suitable as a diagnostic tool, in the way it is being used for COVID-19.
 

450_d4d4601c4fe3c6b143d8232ed1992e7a.png

 
Mullis made no secret of his opinion of Fauci, and recently a video clip of Mullis has reappeared on social media, taken from an older interview he gave during the 1990s. “Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope, and if it’s got a virus in there you’ll know it.”
 
Mullis continued his attack on Fauci’s scientific understanding: “He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don’t know anything about what’s going on in the body.”
 
“You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go. They change them when they want to, and they smugly — like, Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
 
He mentioned that “the main problem with science in this century” was that “science is being judged by people, funding is being done by people, who don’t understand it.”
 
“Who do we trust? Fauci,” he answered with obvious contempt. “Fauci doesn’t know enough to, you know …” Mullis has been vindicated by a group of 22 international scientists, called the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS), who have identified “ten fatal problems” with the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper which was used back in January 2020 to promote PCR tests as the diagnostic tool for COVID-19. Each of the flaws is enough to render the test “useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus,” and the group points to the “worldwide misdiagnosis of infections,” which have resulted from PCR tests for COVID-19. As Mullis noted himself, the ICSLS observed that PCR tests are unable to distinguish between “the whole virus and viral fragments,” meaning that a so-called positive test, as mentioned in the CD paper, cannot determine if one is infected with the virus, but “merely indicates the presence of viral RNA molecules.”
 
Once again, as Mullis had mentioned, the group said that PCR tests can be amplified to a level which renders the results “completely unreliable,” and echoed Mullis’s very words — “amplified PCR products can be anything.”
 
In addition to the flawed tests and fraudulent death certificates, the “experimental” vaccine itself is in violation of Article 32 of the Geneva Convention. Under Article 32 of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, “mutilation and medical or scientific experiments not necessitated by the medical treatment of a protected person” are prohibited. According to Article 147, conducting biological experiments on protected persons is a grave breach of the Convention.
Posted in Default Category on July 05 2022 at 03:46 AM

Comments (3)

No login
  • John
  • Smith
  • Admin